Backing coalition actions in Iraq - a reply from Lieutenant-General Sir Martin Garrod (November 22, 2004)"We are fortunate that President Bush was re-elected. He, and the United States, might indeed save the Western world - but it would be good if he received a little assistance from Europe in so doing."
Now that the Vatican has apologised for the crusades, the Holy Inquisition and for killing so-called heretics, I think it's now time an apology is made for inventing the supernatural doctrines and dogmas at the Council of Nicaea in 325 of the Christian era.
Upcoming Radio Broadcast: November 17/18 - The Jeff Rense Program: A Rational Scientific Explanation For So-Called Psychic Phenomena
|Pacific time: Wednesday, November 17 (8pm)|
GMT (UK and Ireland): Thursday, November 18 (4am)
Check the broadcast time in your time zone: greenwichmeantime.com
After a 20-year fight to have the secular scientific case for survival after death published in Society for Psychical Research literature, Michael Roll's paper A Rational Scientific Explanation For So-Called Psychic Phenomena is now in the latest edition of The Paranormal Review, the Magazine of the Society for Psychical Research.
Michael Roll and Jeff Rense will be discussing the reasons why the scientific proof of survival after death has been deliberately blocked from reaching the masses since Sir William Crookes proved there are people operating in the invisible part of the universe in 1874.
Discovery Channel filmed the experiment for a programme "The Girl with X-ray Eyes" which was broadcast on Thursday, September 30, 2004.
Victor Zammit writes (October 22, 2004):
Natasha, was there FRAUD? Was there CHEATING?Read More...
Were there willful MALICIOUS misrepresentations, to MALICIOUSLY DISPARAGE & DENIGRATE? Was there fundamental failure of 'due diligence'?
Were there attempts to knowingly DESTROY the credibility of the gifted Russian psychic Natasha Demkina on an international level?
UNBELIEVABLE: there was only a 2% chance of guessing 4 out of 7 (as Natasha did) - and these CSICOP experimenters most maliciously call that a failure!! Empiricists and statisticians identified the results as - 'STATISTICALLY VALID'!
Close content analysis of what the debunking skeptics did to Natasha on the Discovery Channel program shows that throughout the show there were continuous 'illegalities', 'illegitimacies' and negativity being heaped onto Natasha. Listening attentively to the show as a whole, it was seen and heard that there was continuous direct and indirect bombardment - and imputations - that Natasha is likely to be: a fraud, a hoax, incompetent and unskilled, not what she claims to be, deceptive, one who cheats and lies, takes money under false pretences, superstitious, not to be trusted, devious, deceitful, dishonest and conniving and that the planners of the experiment had a duty to expose her. Conduct shows the experimenters tried to bring Natasha into international disrepute. This is so the public will never trust her again and that her good name, excellent reputation and character will be permanently destroyed.
"(...) the proof that we are all eternal beings who have the power to decide our own destiny frightens the [power elite] the most. And for quite obvious reasons. They can only maintain their power structure by convincing the masses that they have no power and are little more than organic machines who, once dead, stay dead.
(...) Just suppose, for one moment, a demonstration was given on tv which everyone saw which proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that death is merely a doorway or like changing clothes, if you will. Can you imagine what that would do to the power elite who have sought control variously through religion, politics and, most recently, science? Or rather, their half baked version of science. Certainly it would not stop humanity's insane preoccupation with making war on each other but I would wager that it would make war the exception, rather than the rule. After all, what then would be the point in "killing" your "enemies" if you knew that in fact you had merely moved them to a different frequency of experience and that the day would come when you would have to face them?"
Whenever we speak to people in the etheric wavelengths, the message is always the same:
"There is no place here just reserved for Christians or anybody else. You all survive the death of your physical bodies and are immediately reunited with those have passed over before you. There is no saviour-god who is going to forgive the rotten things you have done on Earth. You are personally responsible and liable for every thought and action during your short stay on Earth - As you sow, then so you will reap."
The secular scientific case for survival after death pulls the rug from under the priests and "holy" men.
They lose their monopoly on the lucrative life after death industry. They must block the proof of survival after death at all costs - they are fighting for their very existence. This is the reason why the priests have joined forces with their most deadly enemies - the materialists.
All the time that orthodox scientific teaching starts from the base that we do not possess a soul that survives the death of our physical bodies, then this suits the professionals who are making money from the subject. It makes the priests (having faith) the only alternative.
The world is at a very dangerous stage. Islam is about where Christianity had reached at the time of the crusades. And confronting them is George W. Bush and half the population of the USA who still believe exactly what the crusaders believed in 1200.
Because of all the terrible religious killing, because of the antics of religious lunatics and their victims, many people are at last starting to make the vital connection - that we should never have been following priests, mullahs, rabbis and "holy" men.
Why was it left to the Editor of a small circulation Spiritualist magazine to defend Crookes?
Surely the members of the Society for Psychical Research should have all been demanding that this one-sided attack in the "New Scientist" was balanced.
Nothing has changed in 2004. Apart from Professor Peter Wadhams, no other qualified scientist has had the courage to openly defend Sir William Crookes against the appalling lies that have been planted on him.
Let the public decide who is right: those who are attacking one of the greatest scientists that this planet has ever produced or those of us who are defending Sir William Crookes, whose only "crime" was to tell the truth and link his revolutionary experiments to the scientific discipline of subatomic physics.
Church of England Priests to be Tried for Heresy! - The Church of England's Thirty Nine Articles of Religion
I am still in a state of shock after reading the editorial in The Daily Telegraph on 10th July 2004 about enforcing Thomas Cranmer's Thirty-nine Articles of Religion that were officially adopted by the Church of England in 1564. Every Anglo-Catholic priest has sworn before "God" that he, and now I presume she, will incorporate these outrageous assertions that no intellectual has believed in for over 100 years.
Apparently it has been decided to activate the ecclesiastical court for heresy in a desperate attempt to root out all the clergy that the Telegraph calls "liberals" - defined in the dictionary as open-minded, not rigorous, unprejudiced, directed to general broadening of the mind, favouring moderate democratic reforms.
Half the Church of England clergy openly follow the former Bishop of Durham, Dr. David Jenkins, and the rest privately agree with what this top academic said. In the 1980s, Dr. Jenkins made it very clear that Church of England priests no longer believe in the supernatural Catholic (all-embracing) doctrines and dogmas that were invented at the Council of Nicaea in 325 of the Christian era together with the 39 Articles: that a book has divine authority, dead bodies leaping out of graves on a mythical Judgement Day, a virgin giving birth to the creator of the universe 2,000 years ago, and, worst of all, that everything we have done wrong on Earth is going to be forgiven just as long as we believe what the priests are teaching etc.
Please see the letter that the Bishop of Salisbury, Dr. John Baker, wrote to me on 3rd March 1983:
"And I would entirely agree that there is no hope for the Churches unless they try to get back to what their Founder taught."
He means Jesus, not St. Paul.
When I met the scientist Ronald Pearson in 1988, he was deeply shocked when I told him that the Church of England priests no longer believe what they are paid to pump into their congregations. I could see that he did not believe me. Therefore, I introduced him to a local Church of England vicar. This vicar confirmed to Ron that everything that Thomas Paine and Arthur Findlay had written about the Christian religion was true. This vicar had first made contact with me following one of my local radio broadcasts. I asked him when he found out that Christianity was a gigantic hoax on the human race. He answered:
"We all do at theological college."
He also told me that every Anglo-Catholic vicar has a great deal of autonomy - personal freedom - unlike the Roman Catholic priests.
Reactivating the ecclesiastical court for heresy tells me that this autonomy is coming to an end in the Anglo-Catholic Church, and with it the Christian religion, as the Bishop of Salisbury made clear to me in 1983.
NB: The Daily Telegraph actually picked out one of the 39 Articles that supported "materialism"!
The truth is always stranger than fiction.
Download a flyer for They Walk Among Us from the Campaign for Philosophical Freedom
With much of the content based on this website, this book presents the secular scientific case for survival after death with the mathematical backup - the proof that we all survive the death of our physical bodies.
Religionists and their obscurant allies in the scientific establishment have a mutual interest in preventing the secular scientific case for survival from entering the public domain - providing a philosophical balance to the vicious materialistic propaganda, which people can accept or reject as the case may be.At last, the public will have access to long-suppressed information and serious discussion of survival after death without any connection whatsoever with priestcraft - without the precondition of having to believe in supernatural absurdities and to grovel before so-called "holy men".
"They Walk Among Us" is dedicated to Ron Pearson, Michael Roll, and John Samson.
"There is scarcely any part of science, or anything in nature, which those imposters and blasphemers of science, called priests, as well Christians as Jews, have not, at some time or other, perverted, or sought to pervert to the purpose of superstition and falsehood."Read More...
Thomas Paine (1737-1809)
Miss Florence Cook's Mediumship - Letter from Sir William Crookes to Spiritualist journals (February 3, 1874)
It is interesting to note that Sir William was left on his own to defend Florence Cook; none of the Spiritualists who had witnessed her revolutionary mediumship came out and supported her, just when she needed their help most.
Rita Goold's mediumship was also witnessed by hundreds of Spiritualists. Not one has helped me to crash through the powerful establishment barriers. In fact, the hierarchy of the Spiritualist movement has fought against me with all their might since I first physically met etheric people in 1983. Neither Alan Cleaver and Gwen Byrne nor Rita Goold are members of the Spiritualist religion. Then, as now, so many Spiritualists look upon scientific investigation as a desecration of their shrine. Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge also ran into this religious brick wall.
The Time is Right for a Paradigm Shift in Physics: Ron Pearson Responds to Criticism of his Theory from Professor B D Josephson
Serious scientists are starting from the correct base that the etheric world exists, and that Sir William Crookes, the former President of the Royal Society, was not a gullible idiot. This great scientist discovered by experimentation that there are people operating in the invisible part of the universe - people who once lived on Earth, and are still very much alive. Those scientists who still refuse to recognise that mind and brain are separate will now be left behind.
It's only a question of making sure that the mathematical theory matches the experiments that prove we all survive the death of our physical bodies.
For goodness sake: Follow the great anti-religious philosophers Thomas Paine and Arthur Findlay!
Do nothing and these crazy born-again Christians in the USA will plunge us all into a Third World War.
"We are going on a Crusade" - Immediately after the WTC tragedy, George W Bush was instinctively preaching a global moral crusade against the dark forces of evil. (It was quickly explained to him that that particular word was not considered so positively by Arabs and Muslims.)Surely the fact that Professor Stephen Hawking went to see the Pope must make alarm bells ring with you? Hawking worships in an Anglo-Catholic Church. I found this out by ringing his Cambridge College just after he returned from his visit to the Pope. I asked the lady who answered the phone if it was true that Prof. Stephen Hawking is a Roman Catholic. She told me that the Dean was in the office at that moment and she would ask him. When she came back she answered, "No, Prof. Hawking worships in an Anglo-Catholic Church.
"In the VIP lounge at the airport Hawking was asked by a reporter what the Pope said to him. Hawking answered,
"I don't care what you do in science, just as long as you never encroach on my subject, life after death."
Hence the Royal Society pact with the priests never to look into life after death. This pact dates from the 17th century and it is still in force.
|Related material on this site:|
Lord Dowding's Return - by J. J. Snyder
Psychic News reported that this was featured without the usual hatchet job from "sceptical" psychologists masquerading as experts on the subject of life after death on BBC Radio 4 on Christmas Eve (repeated on New Year's Day).
Psychic News even published the websites that put forward the scientific proof of survival after death - the experimental proof of survival - a separate mind and brain - together with the mathematical backup:
We can only hope that this will now spread to other media outlets throughout the world, and not just be featured on the website of Jeff Rense, the brave US broadcaster.
The secular scientific proof of survival after death also proves that the model of the universe that is being presented by cosmologists is incorrect. Once this hits mainstream media outlets, the scientific textbooks will have to be rewritten, and the "holy men" will be made redundant. Public opinion will make sure of this.
Please pass this information on to as many people as possible for them to accept or reject as the case may be.
To Professor Archie Roy (Astrophysics, Glasgow University and former President of the Society for Psychical Research)
"Just read Oliver Lodge's article The Mode Of Future Existence. It's a marvellous piece of writing - no doubt it's total anathema to both the clergy and the materialist scientists!
It's the kind of article I could read and re-read, always getting something new out of it to think about."
This is the reaction from everyone who reads Sir Oliver Lodge's article The Mode Of Future Existence where this great scientist links the study of life after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe.
It's outrageous that the only way people can read this article is through this website.
Now that BBC Radio 4 has broadcast a factual report of experiments that were carried out with the materialisation medium Minnie Harrison, will you now back Michael Roll's Rita Goold Report?
Archie Roy and Michael Roll have both taken part in the same experiment and witnessed six recently deceased people fully materialising every time the medium Rita Goold gave a demonstration. They have both met Pat and Barry Jeffery and Gwen and Alf Byrne - parents who have been physically reunited with their "dead" children in hundreds of repeatable experiments.
There are now two schools of scientific thought:
• We do survive the death of our physical bodies.
• We don't survive the death of our physical bodies.
The tragedy is that only the scientific case against survival is being presented to the public.
This just can't be right.
Archie Roy, please help to balance this one-sided propaganda.
Robert Hooke (1635 - 1703)
This superb documentary told the truth about the appalling hatred, jealousy, and corruption within the scientific community. This was at the time of Sir Isaac Newton. It is much worse today!
Robert Hooke was the Ronald Pearson of his day. He was crucified for telling the truth, ironically by Sir Isaac Newton!
Hooke, for example, said that light travels like a wave, which Newton rubbished.
The orthodox scientific model of the universe is desperately wrong. This is because they have failed to do what Ronald Pearson has done - start all calculations by recognising that the etheric world is the source of all energy.
The only way forward for scientific teaching is to do the biggest u-turn in history and follow Ron Pearson's lead. He needs support - not opposition - for his theory from brilliant mathematicians. Any genuine scientists - seekers after truth - should be beating a path to Pearson's door. As it is, only Prof. Peter Wadhams has had the courage to offer Ron any support - they broadcast together on the Jeff Rense Radio programme.
”Intellectual capacity is no guarantee against being dead wrong."