E-mail from Michael Roll to Steve Grenard and Hal Fox (December 21, 2003): Sir Isaac Newton

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Tony Blair does not only believe in what Sir Isaac Newton had rejected in the 17th century, but he also believes the Bible is the word of his God!"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Tariq Ali (December 15, 2003): The Truth About Colonialism

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In 1947 the historian Arthur Findlay told the truth about colonialism - 'The Curse of Ignorance'. Not only that, he told the truth about the whole history of mankind. Needless to say this history really upset the powerful thought police who control what information people are allowed to receive."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Dr Sam Parnia (December 6, 2003): Scientific Proof

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"This keeps the old-boy network ticking over nicely and makes sure the priests, mullahs and rabbis keep their monopoly on the vast and lucrative life after death industry. So-called orthodox scientists who are adamant that death is the end of everything, that the mind and brain are the same, will be made to look just as silly as the priests when this scientific back up for your research into Near Death Experiences eventually enters the public domain."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Montague Keen (December 2, 2003): Perrott-Warrick

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I can't understand why the latest recipient of money from the Perrott-Warrick fund, Prof. Delanoy, refuses to take part in any experiments with a materialisation medium. This is the only type of medium that can actually prove survival after death with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions where all five of our senses are working."
Read More...

E-mail from John Gillespie to Michael Roll (November 10, 2003): A Rational Explanation for "Supernatural" Phenomena

In his e-mail, John Gillespie writes:
"True salvation is free thought and philosophical freedom and not false prophets or gods, or blind faith in the perversity, bigotry and irrationality of any system of religious belief."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Barry Duke (November 9, 2003): A Rational Explanation for "Supernatural" Phenomena

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Scientists have discovered people in the invisible part of the universe. Not angels, devils, gods or God, but people who are just as thick and stupid as when they were on Earth."
Read More...

E-mail from Ronald Pearson to Keith Hudson (August 28, 2003): Origin and Destiny of Religion

In his e-mail, Ronald Pearson writes:
"The conflict between science and religion is only a deliberate surface projection.
(...)
This artificial division is blocking the progress of both disciplines since there can be only one truth."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (July 4, 2003): Flaws in Physics - WHY PHYSICISTS SHOULD LISTEN TO ENGINEERS

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"The mathematical expertise of the physicist is admired and not denied but the engineer can help with the simple things and so could have a useful part to play. This flaw would be immediately obvious to any mechanical engineer, especially one with experience of turbine design, since the effect is analogous to that used to extract energy from a fluid by a moving rotor."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to London University Students (June 18, 2003): The Independent Television Commission

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"There is a good reason why the priests, mullahs, rabbis, and ministers of religion like Billy Graham, must destroy the very idea of mediumship. This is because whenever we make contact with people in the etheric wavelengths the message is always the same, it never varies:

We all survive the death of our physical bodies, there is no place here just reserved for Christians or anybody else."
Read More...

E-mail from Ronald Pearson to Rory MacDonald (May 8, 2003): Answer to Critique

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson responds to criticism of his theories:
"I think the problem is that theorists are still considering sub-atomic particles as real when wave-particle duality indicates that they are simply abstract constructs of the background mind."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Robert Giddings (May 2, 2003): Corruption on a Scale that Beggars the Mind!

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"There is no such thing as all these dangerous and divisive religions. It's mythology, or as you so rightly say in your review, superstition gone mad."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Gary Schwartz (May 1, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This begs the question, why has Prof. Archie Roy kept quiet about the revolutionary mediumship of Rita Goold that he witnessed in 1983?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Barry Eaton (April 18, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In order to protect the jobs and reputations of professional "experts", organisations and Trust funds that have been set up specifically to look into life after death and related subjects have been infiltrated and destroyed from within. Huge amounts of money have been deliberately funnelled towards "experts" who can be relied upon to make sure the public never have access to the published work of scientists who started from the base of linking survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe."
Read More...

E-mail from Dr N Clarke to Nexus Magazine (March 25, 2003): DEFUSING FUNDAMENTALISM

In his e-mail, Dr N Clarke writes:
"From a start made to solve a difficulty in the big bang theory, consciousness has been shown to have the potential of being immortal. If the brain is conscious as well, it cannot be the primary consciousness. The latter must still remain after the brain has died. "
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to John Turner (March 15, 2003): The Subject of Survival After Death has Been Hijacked by Religionists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"My long fight to present the work of Arthur Findlay within the Spiritualist movement has had the opposite effect to the one I was hoping for. Instead of bringing all the Spiritualists over to Findlay's secular scientific approach to the study of survival after death it has caused an exodus. The thousands of people who have bothered to read Findlay's books have immediately left the movement."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Lyn G de Swarte (February 28, 2003): Arthur Findlay

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Today we only have to turn on our televisions to see the result of what happens when people refuse to think for themselves. Voltaire got it spot on:

"People who believe absurdities commit atrocities.""
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor B D Josephson (February 24, 2003): "Psi Supporters"

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I hope you are right and the "psi supporters" at Edinburgh University now pluck up the courage to come out in the open and back Parnia and Fenwick."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to an Inquirer (January 31, 2003): Presenting the Secular Scientific Case for Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The whole point of my fight for a balance on media outlets is to point out that there is no balance at the moment."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 28, 2003): Scientific Proof and Religion

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The Church has ditched the idea of a "spiritual" resurrection which would fall in line with the scientific experiments proving survival and your mathematical backup."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to Rev. Tim Ling (January 27, 2003): New Physics Could Support the Church

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"My own physics gives proof on two levels that consciousness survives death of the body and that the universe was deliberately created."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 21, 2003): Scientific Proof of Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In all my writings, broadcasts and lectures I say the religionists are basically correct, we do indeed possess a soul and survive the death of our physical body. The priests and the believers in priestcraft flatly refuse to grab this lifeline."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Hugh Thomas (January 21, 2003): Scientific Proof and the Media

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The people who have hijacked the Spiritualist movement are exactly the same as Bush, Blair and bin Laden, they are absolutely convinced that the creator of the universe is on their side."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Heidi Proven (January 11, 2003): Ronald Pearson

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The British scientist Ronald Pearson is the man who has discovered the so-called next world, he has put a structure to the "spirit" world. This is the greatest scientific breakthrough in the history of mankind."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 10, 2003): Scientific Proof

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"this memo to William Woollard could explain why Dr. John Beloff and Professor Archie Roy worked together to make sure your scientific paper did not come to the attention of members of the Society for Psychical Research via their journal."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to an Inquirer (January 7, 2003): A Gigantic Hoax on the Human Race

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"(...) all these dangerous and divisive religions are a gigantic hoax on the human race. All invented by men who knew nothing whatsoever about the universe who thought a red hot ball of fire went round a flat Earth every day. Their followers are still running this planet today! We are heading for a Third World War if Bush and Blair are not stopped in their tracks."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to David Duffield (January 6, 2003): Philosophical Balance

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am appealing to the British sense of fair play. Every time you hear James Randi and his devoted followers, who still have total control of all media and educational outlets, attack our great scientist Sir William Crookes. Please say, all right, we have heard your case that Crookes was a liar, a fraud, a crank, a gullible Spiritualist, and a sex maniac. May we now please hear from qualified scientists who disagree with everything you say about this former President of the Royal Society?"
Read More...