Open Letter from Ron Pearson (September 9, 2014): The Scientific Discovery of the Spiritual Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"Could you professors all please help by writing to New Scientist to inform them of the existence of this solution?
The solution is important to this group's aim of communicating SURVIVAL as fact since it forms a main feature of its explanation."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (August 2, 2014): General Relativity

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"In 1988 Dr. Louis Essen, famous for his caesium beam atomic clock, published a critique saying Einstein broke the rules of logic in positing that a compound unit based on two basic units could be a universal constant. This was the speed of light: distance divided by time. "
Read More...

E-mail to Amy Jones of The Sun (June 13, 2014): An Englishman Invented the Wireless

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Sir Oliver Lodge] dared to link the study of life after death with natural and normal forces in the universe."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to The Daily Telegraph (January 28, 2014): Professor Halton Arp (March 21, 1927 - December 28, 2013)

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"These huge explosions, quasars, that can be seen in the picture are the result of a primordial gas exploding and creating a new galaxy.

The gas must be coming from the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874 following repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions and the results published in The Quarterly Journal of Science – 140 years ago exactly."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to UK Newspapers (December 19, 2013): Scientists Agree that the Spiritual Part of the Universe Exists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"We should have been following Sir Isaac Newton's spiritual model of the universe, not Einstein's materialistic model."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 18, 2013): Scientists Agree that the Spiritual Part of the Universe Exists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Newton was on our side, he recognised that we all possess a soul that separates from the dead physical body."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Steve Clarke (November 30, 2013): Professor Richard Dawkins puts the Record Straight

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Everybody who has made a careful study of life after death knows very well that (…) our pioneers of radio and television (…) were linking the subject of survival after death with subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (November 26, 2013): Scientific Teaching has Lost the Plot

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"All scientists now agree that 99% of the universe is missing. Surely this is the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Rupert Sheldrake (November 4, 2013): Scientific Discovery of the Spiritual Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Archie Roy […] said, “We have no idea what gravity is.” I told him that it seemed obvious to me that it is the force of the spiritual part of the universe."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (July 16, 2013): The Cosmological Location of the Spiritual Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"How right you were when you made that statement that the greatest breakthrough will come via physics and not psychology."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to Vlatco Vedral (April 21, 2013): Matter is Made from Information - not Energy

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"I was intrigued to see that quantum physicists are now saying that our world is constructed entirely of information and not energy. But do they have any idea of the source of that information?”
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Lord May (November 16, 2005): Subatomic Physics: The Study of the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Surely Ronald Pearson must now be in line for the Nobel Prize for Physics that should have been given to the pioneers of subatomic physics, Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge? I can't think of anything more important than the scientific discovery of the so-called next world because it affects every person on Earth. "
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to New Scientist (March 9, 2005): The Discovery of People in the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I consider the "Cleaver Report" to be one of the most important scientific experiments ever. This is because he carried out the experiment in 1982 that Sir William Crookes was unable to do in 1874."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (May 17, 2004): A Holistic Solution is Available

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"Readers need to know that a little read theory has been available in a scientific journal since 1997 that shows all these problems can be resolved simultaneously. Added credibility is provided from the way a solution to the vexed question of the "cosmological constant" is provided - and no other solution has yet appeared!"
Read More...

E-mail from Professor Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (May 7, 2004): Sir William Crookes

In his e-mail, Professor Peter Wadhams writes:
"It is a psychological phenomenon. Deep down they know that great scientists who engage in this kind of work and get positive results should be believed and should cause this subject to become a central theme of the world's scientific effort. But they dare not accept this thought. So to square their consciences and make the dissonance less extreme they have to invent reasons to pretend that the great scientist is not actually as great as he seems, that he's somehow naive or bonkers or that his conventional discoveries weren't as important as they at first appear."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (July 4, 2003): Flaws in Physics - WHY PHYSICISTS SHOULD LISTEN TO ENGINEERS

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"The mathematical expertise of the physicist is admired and not denied but the engineer can help with the simple things and so could have a useful part to play. This flaw would be immediately obvious to any mechanical engineer, especially one with experience of turbine design, since the effect is analogous to that used to extract energy from a fluid by a moving rotor."
Read More...

E-mail from Ronald Pearson to Rory MacDonald (May 8, 2003): Answer to Critique

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson responds to criticism of his theories:
"I think the problem is that theorists are still considering sub-atomic particles as real when wave-particle duality indicates that they are simply abstract constructs of the background mind."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Barry Eaton (April 18, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In order to protect the jobs and reputations of professional "experts", organisations and Trust funds that have been set up specifically to look into life after death and related subjects have been infiltrated and destroyed from within. Huge amounts of money have been deliberately funnelled towards "experts" who can be relied upon to make sure the public never have access to the published work of scientists who started from the base of linking survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe."
Read More...

E-mail from Dr N Clarke to Nexus Magazine (March 25, 2003): DEFUSING FUNDAMENTALISM

In his e-mail, Dr N Clarke writes:
"From a start made to solve a difficulty in the big bang theory, consciousness has been shown to have the potential of being immortal. If the brain is conscious as well, it cannot be the primary consciousness. The latter must still remain after the brain has died. "
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 28, 2003): Scientific Proof and Religion

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The Church has ditched the idea of a "spiritual" resurrection which would fall in line with the scientific experiments proving survival and your mathematical backup."
Read More...

E-mail from Ron Pearson to Rev. Tim Ling (January 27, 2003): New Physics Could Support the Church

In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"My own physics gives proof on two levels that consciousness survives death of the body and that the universe was deliberately created."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 21, 2003): Scientific Proof of Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In all my writings, broadcasts and lectures I say the religionists are basically correct, we do indeed possess a soul and survive the death of our physical body. The priests and the believers in priestcraft flatly refuse to grab this lifeline."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Heidi Proven (January 11, 2003): Ronald Pearson

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The British scientist Ronald Pearson is the man who has discovered the so-called next world, he has put a structure to the "spirit" world. This is the greatest scientific breakthrough in the history of mankind."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Sam Nicholls (December 10, 2002): James Randi

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Randi] and his supporters are always given total freedom on all media and educational outlets in the UK to attack arguably two of the greatest scientists that Great Britain has ever produced: The President of the Royal Society and holder of the Order of Merit, Sir William Crookes, and the inventor of radio, Sir Oliver Lodge FRS. No scientist, however well qualified, is allowed on media and educational outlets to balance these attacks."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Deborah L Delanoy (December 5, 2002): The Perrott-Warrick Scholarship

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Sir William Crookes] proved there are people living in the invisible part of the universe with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions. As you have received money from the Perrott-Warrick fund to look into the subject it is essential you take part in experiments with a materialisation medium."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 1, 2002): Scientific Proof and the Media

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Whenever a scientist makes a public stand and links so-called paranormal phenomena with quantum mechanics, that is, hints that there may be a rational scientific explanation to account for any aspect of the "paranormal", it's as if a button is pushed on media computers and a list of names pop up of "experts" who will immediately be wheeled on to rubbish any scientist who dares to support Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge, the pioneers of radio, television and subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Jeff Rense (November 29, 2002): Scientific Proof

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Those within the Spiritualist movement now realise just how important it is to repeat the pioneering experiments with materialisation mediums. This time using modern recording equipment under the direction of contemporary professors of physics from Cambridge University."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Chris Robinson (August 16, 2002): Einstein has got it Wrong!

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Ronald Pearson's mathematics matches the experiments proving survival after death. Einstein's Theory of Relativity did away with the ether (the "spirit" world) in 1905. A scientific disaster."
Read More...

Letter from Ronald Pearson to Nexus Magazine (August, 2002): A Creative Universal Structure

In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present."
Read More...

E-mail from Professor Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (August 5, 2002): Sir William Crookes was Poisoned by Thallium!

In his e-mail, Professor Wadhams writes:
"(...) it is necessary to demonstrate that Crookes was out of his mind because experimental evidence that does not agree with the standard settled world view has to be discredited in some way (...)"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Peter Wadhams (August 4, 2002): Sir William Crookes

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am familiar with the usual outrageous accusations aimed at Sir William Crookes, that he was a liar, a cheat, a crank, a fraud and that he was having sex with the medium that he worked with. However, in last months issue of The Paranormal Review (July 2002) Professor Bernard Carr reports that the obscurants have also floated the idea that Sir William must have been poisoned by the chemical element that he discovered - thallium!"
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Gary McCormack (July 22, 2002): Experiments Proving Survival After Death

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"For goodness sake don't fall for this propaganda that scientists only want to make mediums into a freak show. Only scientists who are on our side will be let anywhere near a materialisation medium."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Melody Mehta (May 19, 2002): Ronald Pearson

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"As you know Pearson's papers have been censored by every organisation that is pretending to be looking into life after death and related subjects, especially The Society for Psychical Research!"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (May 1, 2002): The Vatican Takes Its Own Scientific Path

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"They date everything from 1543, Copernicus, the Roman Catholic priest who said the Earth goes round the Sun. They are of course very careful not to let the public know that Copernicus came across the work of the great Greek scientist Aristarchus 280 BC! The Vatican has now embraced Darwin hook, line and sinker. However, again they are very careful not to mention Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-author of the Theory of Evolution. He has been written out of our Christian history books because he put forward the secular case for survival after death as a branch of physics - that we are dealing with natural forces in the universe.

All the time orthodox scientists have gone down the wrong path - the Big Bang and Einstein's Theory of Relativity they are no danger whatsoever to the power of the priests. It makes the priests the only alternative, they keep the mystery going and their lucrative monopoly on the vast life after death industry."
Read More...

E-mail from Professor Peter Wadhams to an Inquirer (February 11, 2002): Ignoring Positive Evidence for "Psi"

In his e-mail, Prof. Wadhams writes:
"The cumulative evidence for the existence of psi, for instance, is absolutely overwhelming, both from carefully framed statistical experiments designed to detect tiny effect sizes and from case studies of more spectacular spontaneous cases. (...) Yet psi today scarcely seems to enter the consciousness of most scientists."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Ray Taylor (December 1, 2001): Linking Survival with Subatomic Physics

This letter was written in response to Prof. David Fontana's letter in the December 2001 issue of Psychic World.

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Psychologists and parapsychologists get very upset when people like me follow Sir Oliver Lodge and link survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics. They feel that their authority is threatened."
Read More...

Letter from Tom Jones to Dr Chris Roe (November 22, 2001): Survival Research

This letter was written in response to Prof. David Fontana's article about survival research in the October issue of Paranormal Review.

In his letter, Tom Jones writes:
"I am at a loss to understand why the Paranormal Review is not concentrating more on the study of the invisible part of the universe - quantum mechanics."


Thomas Jones quotes the Nobel Laureate for Medical Science, Professor Charles Richet:
"There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific fact."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Dr Peter Wadhams (14 June, 2001): Destruction of Sir William Crookes FRS

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"We can only stop this appalling deception if all scientists take action to introduce a balance on all media and educational outlets. Supporters of Crookes are censored at the moment."
Read More...

Ronald Pearson's Response to Bernard Carr's Letter of March 17, 2001 (March 31, 2001): Is The SPR Serious About Being Even Handed?

This letter was published in Psychic News, March 31, 2001

In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"Theorists are searching for a 'Theory of Everything' and yet deliberately ignore the major factor: that psi phenomena suggest that something else must exist behind the universe of matter."

"The SPR refused my paper on grounds that it needed to first appear in a scientific journal because the expertise needed for its assessment did not exist within the SPR. This condition is now satisfied (...). Is the SPR now prepared to prove its claim of having no corporate policy by publication of this approach?"
Read More...

Open Letter from Michael Roll to Dr Peter Wadhams (March, 2001): Only the Physics Connection is Censored

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"University psychologists are appeasing orthodox scientific teaching that has started from the base that we do not possess a soul. Any psychologist that backed the idea of a soul would have their careers destroyed immediately by the powerful physicists and biologists who are adamant that death is the end of everything."
Read More...

Letter from Dr Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (November 11, 2000): Experimental Proof of Survival after Death

In his letter, Dr Wadhams writes:
"There was no question about the seriousness of [Sir William Crookes'] psychic investigations, and his endorsement of Katie King represented a real challenge to science. It was a challenge which science flunked, of course, perhaps because conventional scientists were being asked to swallow too much too quickly."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Dawson to Michael Roll (September 26, 2000): Book "The Conscious Universe"

In his e-mail, Mr Dawson summarises a book "The Conscious Universe" by Dean Radin, director of the Consciousness Research Laboratory at University of Nevada, Las Vegas:
"(...) Radin dispels the misinformation and superstition that have clouded the understanding of scientists and laypeople alike concerning a host of fascinating oddities."
Read More...

Letter from Ian Robson to New Scientist (December 6, 1999): Counter-Arguments to Einstein's Theories

In his letter, Ian Robson writes:
”It should be pointed out that since Einstein published his theories, more than a few eminent researchers have produced counter-arguments to them.”

(…)

””Since quantum mechanics came into being, the famous scientist Stephen Hawkingadmitted that this branch of physics is incompatible with relativity and that one or the other must be wrong.”

(…)

”Will your magazine tell the truth to the British people?”
Read More...

Open Letter from Ron Pearson to John Samson (August 13, 1999): Does the Society for Psychical Research Have a "Corporate Policy"?

In his letter, Ron Pearson writes:
"The corporate policy of the SPR is to support a paradigm of established physics: that mind is mere brain function.
(…)
This is in direct conflict with an overwhelming bulk of evidence, which shows that our immortal minds transfer to another system of matter invisible and untouchable to us (since it operates on a different quantum wavelength). I think this is the main reason the Church has tried to suppress the truth about the real nature of spirituality for so many centuries."
Read More...

Letter from Nancy Kolenda to Ron Pearson (August 8, 1997): Publication of Consciousness as a Sub-quantum Phenomenon

At the time of writing, Nancy Kolenda was Director of The Center for Frontier Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.

In her letter, Nancy Kolenda writes:
"I am most grateful to you for submitting such as fine paper and admire your editing cooperation. May we be honored to have you submit future papers in Frontier Perspectives."
Read More...

Letter from Rev. Anthony Freeman to Ronald Pearson (January 21, 1996): Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation

At the time of writing, Rev. Anthony Freeman was Managing Editor of The Journal of Consciousness Studies

Rev. Freeman wrote to Ronald Pearson, rejecting his paper "Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation”.
In his letter, Rev. Freeman writes of the assessment of Ronald Pearson's paper:
"You will disagree with its conclusion, but I am sure you will recognise a fair and considered assessment of the situation in which we find ourselves.”
Read More...

Letter from Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne to Ronald Pearson (October 15, 1993)

In his letter, John Polkinghorne writes:
"I have to say that the quantum theory of gravity is exceptionally difficult and I am very doubtful that it is possible for amateurs, however gifted and interested, to make contributions to it.”
Read More...

Letter from Professor Archie Roy to Michael Roll (August 22, 1983): Recording the Proof of Survival

In his letter, Prof. Roy writes:
"I have, however, now found two scientists who have facilities for providing infra-red source and infra-red converter telescopes (...) [so that] the observer at the infra-red telescope can see clearly what is going on and in fact, if desired, can record like video."
Read More...

Letter from Professor Abdus Salam to Michael Roll (October 14, 1982): Excommunication from Islam

Professor Salam's handwritten letter to Michael Roll reads as follows:
"You will be interested to know that officially, I have been already excommunicated from Islam by the orthodox priests in Pakistan. However I do believe in Allah and in worship - but as something personal and not institutional.
I hope your book is published. It's much needed - as much against Christian as against Muslim priests. How marvellous Bertrand Russell was to write on this subject."
Read More...