E-mail from Michael Roll to John Samson (September 16, 2002): Society for Psychical Research

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This crushing proof of survival after death was not only censored by those who control what sees the light of day within the one-god religion of Spiritualism. It has also been censored by the thought police who have infiltrated the Society for Psychical Research ever since I first submitted these reports in 1983."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Gary McCormack (July 22, 2002): Experiments Proving Survival After Death

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"For goodness sake don't fall for this propaganda that scientists only want to make mediums into a freak show. Only scientists who are on our side will be let anywhere near a materialisation medium."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Gary Schwartz (May 1, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This begs the question, why has Prof. Archie Roy kept quiet about the revolutionary mediumship of Rita Goold that he witnessed in 1983?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to John Turner (March 15, 2003): The Subject of Survival After Death has Been Hijacked by Religionists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"My long fight to present the work of Arthur Findlay within the Spiritualist movement has had the opposite effect to the one I was hoping for. Instead of bringing all the Spiritualists over to Findlay's secular scientific approach to the study of survival after death it has caused an exodus. The thousands of people who have bothered to read Findlay's books have immediately left the movement."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to New Scientist (March 9, 2005): The Discovery of People in the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I consider the "Cleaver Report" to be one of the most important scientific experiments ever. This is because he carried out the experiment in 1982 that Sir William Crookes was unable to do in 1874."
Read More...

Response from Michael Roll to Colin Fry's Complaint (May 10, 2002): Scientific Proof

In May 2002, the medium Colin Fry complained about a statement made on this site.

In an e-mail, written on July 11, 2001, it was stated that Colin Fry had offered to work with Psychical Research Involving Selected Mediums (PRISM) and that PRISM did not take up his offer.

Colin Fry's e-mail to us is reproduced here, with a statement from Michael Roll.

In e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This proof that we all survive the death of our physical bodies belongs to every person on Earth, not just a handful of people who happen to wander into the Spiritualist movement which is an officially recognised one-god religion."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (May 1, 2002): The Vatican Takes Its Own Scientific Path

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"They date everything from 1543, Copernicus, the Roman Catholic priest who said the Earth goes round the Sun. They are of course very careful not to let the public know that Copernicus came across the work of the great Greek scientist Aristarchus 280 BC! The Vatican has now embraced Darwin hook, line and sinker. However, again they are very careful not to mention Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-author of the Theory of Evolution. He has been written out of our Christian history books because he put forward the secular case for survival after death as a branch of physics - that we are dealing with natural forces in the universe.

All the time orthodox scientists have gone down the wrong path - the Big Bang and Einstein's Theory of Relativity they are no danger whatsoever to the power of the priests. It makes the priests the only alternative, they keep the mystery going and their lucrative monopoly on the vast life after death industry."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (July 16, 2013): The Cosmological Location of the Spiritual Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"How right you were when you made that statement that the greatest breakthrough will come via physics and not psychology."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Montague Keen (December 2, 2003): Perrott-Warrick

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I can't understand why the latest recipient of money from the Perrott-Warrick fund, Prof. Delanoy, refuses to take part in any experiments with a materialisation medium. This is the only type of medium that can actually prove survival after death with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions where all five of our senses are working."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to David Duffield (January 6, 2003): Philosophical Balance

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am appealing to the British sense of fair play. Every time you hear James Randi and his devoted followers, who still have total control of all media and educational outlets, attack our great scientist Sir William Crookes. Please say, all right, we have heard your case that Crookes was a liar, a fraud, a crank, a gullible Spiritualist, and a sex maniac. May we now please hear from qualified scientists who disagree with everything you say about this former President of the Royal Society?"
Read More...