E-mail from Michael Roll to Charles Lowson (November 17, 2002): Only the Proof of Survival After Death is Censored, Evidence is Allowed Out

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"As biologists flatly refuse to recognise people in the invisible part of the universe, most of their conclusions are just as false as the base that the physicists have started from. Until they all do a complete u-turn orthodox scientific teaching is going in the same direction as the Church - nowhere."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to John Samson (September 16, 2002): Society for Psychical Research

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This crushing proof of survival after death was not only censored by those who control what sees the light of day within the one-god religion of Spiritualism. It has also been censored by the thought police who have infiltrated the Society for Psychical Research ever since I first submitted these reports in 1983."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to John Samson (11 July 2001): Psychical Research Involving Selected Mediums (PRISM)

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"The fact that American scientists are behaving like seekers after knowledge (scientists) will really put the pressure on the hierarchy of the Society for Psychical Research who have been censoring papers that connect survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to John Samson (March 9, 2002): Protecting Supernatural Doctrines and Dogmas

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"As you know these passages were inserted in the Bible by priests to protect their supernatural doctrines and dogmas from what etheric people say whenever we make contact with them:

"There is no place here just reserved for Christians or anybody else, we all survive the death of our physical bodies."

This makes all the priests redundant."
Read More...

Letter from John Samson to Victor Zammit (July 7, 2001): IS THERE A WIDENING DIVISION BETWEEN PARAPSYCHOLOGISTS AND SURVIVALISTS AT THE SPR?

Part of this letter was published in Psychic News.

In his letter, John Samson writes:
"I am well aware that cultural and educational conditioning makes the truly open mind a difficult thing to achieve in any society, but I discovered the level of equivocation and negativity in the upper echelons of the SPR to be quite remarkable, especially in view of the work done by its pioneers and the volume of psychical evidence they accumulated."
Read More...

Open Letter from Michael Roll to John Samson (April 1, 2001): SPR Censoring Scientific Proof of Survival After Death

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"In April's Psychic World, letters from the Secretary of the SPR and its President have totally ignored the fact that every paper presented to the SPR that links the subject of survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics is censored by those who are running the show. This proves that the SPR does have a "corporate opinion"."
Read More...

Letter from John Samson to Psychic News (January 24, 2001): Ronald Pearson

This letter was published in Psychic News, January, 2001

In his letter, John Samson writes:
"In my view, Ronald Pearson has been the victim of such misuse in a way that has left many of us baffled and dismayed. Especially so because sub-atomic physics now features with growing prominence as a legitimate line of enquiry in the paranormal arena, and Mr. Pearson's approach is simply a further reflection of this."
Read More...

Open Letter from John Samson (January 9, 2001): Survivalists in the SPR

This letter was written after Professor Bernard Carr was made President of the SPR.

Professor Bernard Carr and his committee rejected Ronald Pearson's paper that he had prepared for the 23rd International Conference of the SPR held at the University of Durham in September 1999. He also censored Michael Roll's paper that told the story of how mothers had been physically reunited with their "dead" children over and over again.
Professor Carr justified this decision with the following words:
"Your topic is not really appropriate for the conference audience.”


In his letter, John Samson writes:
"when one links this statement with the vociferous attempts by those at the heart of the SPR who wished to suppress the Scole Report and regarded it as 'an embarrassment to the Society', then we are confronted by a most regrettable situation indeed.”
Read More...

Open Letter from Ron Pearson to John Samson (August 13, 1999): Does the Society for Psychical Research Have a "Corporate Policy"?

In his letter, Ron Pearson writes:
"The corporate policy of the SPR is to support a paradigm of established physics: that mind is mere brain function.
(…)
This is in direct conflict with an overwhelming bulk of evidence, which shows that our immortal minds transfer to another system of matter invisible and untouchable to us (since it operates on a different quantum wavelength). I think this is the main reason the Church has tried to suppress the truth about the real nature of spirituality for so many centuries."
Read More...