Open Letter from Ron Pearson (September 9, 2014): The Scientific Discovery of the Spiritual Part of the Universe
2014-September-09 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"Could you professors all please help by writing to New Scientist to inform them of the existence of this solution?Read More...
The solution is important to this group's aim of communicating SURVIVAL as fact since it forms a main feature of its explanation."
E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (August 2, 2014): General Relativity
2014-August-02 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"In 1988 Dr. Louis Essen, famous for his caesium beam atomic clock, published a critique saying Einstein broke the rules of logic in positing that a compound unit based on two basic units could be a universal constant. This was the speed of light: distance divided by time. "
E-mail from Michael Roll to Polly Toynbee (May 3, 2014): These Religious Nuts are Determined to get us in a Third World War
2014-May-03 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Only Nigel Farage has had the guts to warn that it is the EU that is causing all the hatred in the Ukraine."
E-mail from John Gillespie to Michael Roll (November 10, 2003): A Rational Explanation for "Supernatural" Phenomena
2003-November-10 Filed in: Religion
In his e-mail, John Gillespie writes:
"True salvation is free thought and philosophical freedom and not false prophets or gods, or blind faith in the perversity, bigotry and irrationality of any system of religious belief."Read More...
E-mail from Dr N Clarke to Nexus Magazine (March 25, 2003): DEFUSING FUNDAMENTALISM
In his e-mail, Dr N Clarke writes:
"From a start made to solve a difficulty in the big bang theory, consciousness has been shown to have the potential of being immortal. If the brain is conscious as well, it cannot be the primary consciousness. The latter must still remain after the brain has died. "Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Heidi Proven (January 11, 2003): Ronald Pearson
2003-January-11 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The British scientist Ronald Pearson is the man who has discovered the so-called next world, he has put a structure to the "spirit" world. This is the greatest scientific breakthrough in the history of mankind."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Lyn G de Swarte (September 8, 2002): Let's Film the Proof of Survival
2002-September-08 Filed in: Mediums
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This is it, the crushing scientific proof of survival after death that we have all been waiting for. The experimental proof that matches up with Ronald Pearson's discoveries in subatomic physics."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (December 7, 2013): Trying to Bring the Church With Us
2013-December-07 Filed in: Religion
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Sorry Ron, the Church has moved much further away from Jesus in the last few years, not closer."
E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (December 4, 2013): Why I am Optimistic
2013-December-04 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"It is now time to give people a scientific balance on mainstream media and educational outlets: Newton or Einstein?"
E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (November 26, 2013): Scientific Teaching has Lost the Plot
2013-November-26 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"All scientists now agree that 99% of the universe is missing. Surely this is the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874?"Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Richard Harries (November 4, 2002): Updating Religion
2002-November-04 Filed in: Religion
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"The born-again Christians, along with other religious fundamentalists, are fast becoming a great danger to this planet."Read More...
E-mail from Ron Pearson to Rev. Tim Ling (January 27, 2003): New Physics Could Support the Church
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"My own physics gives proof on two levels that consciousness survives death of the body and that the universe was deliberately created."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 28, 2003): Scientific Proof and Religion
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The Church has ditched the idea of a "spiritual" resurrection which would fall in line with the scientific experiments proving survival and your mathematical backup."Read More...
Letter from Ronald Pearson to Nexus Magazine (August, 2002): A Creative Universal Structure
2002-August-05 Filed in: Science
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"Theorists cannot switch off their 'Big Bang', so it remains as an embarrassing problem called the 'cosmological constant' which totally invalidates all the scenarios they present."Read More...
Letter from Dr Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (August 11, 2000): Survival After Death
2000-August-11 Filed in: Survival
In his letter, Dr Wadhams writes:
"(...) everyone in the UK is brought up from childhood (...) with basic Christian concepts which include the survival of death. But nobody (including priests) then thinks or says any more about it - indeed, death is a forbidden subject in our society."Read More...
"Acceptance of survival after death is something which produces a shattering change in one's whole outlook on life (...). In my case, it didn't, and I think I know why. It was just intellectual acceptance (...). I never achieved emotional acceptance of survival - which would mean being absolutely convinced by personal experience."
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (August 25, 2002): Professional Wreckers
2002-August-25 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Dr John] Beloff is the perfect ally for James Randi and all the rest of the professional wreckers who are fighting with all their might to block the secular scientific case for survival from reaching the public."Read More...
Letter from Ron Pearson to Psychic News (November 6, 2002): Why the World Needs Physical Mediumship Right Now!
2002-November-06 Filed in: Mediums
In his letter, Ron Pearson writes:
"We know that when we depart this life we re-emerge without destruction into a new environment. We are privileged to have this insight because most people on Earth do not. It is therefore important that our knowledge be communicated as widely and as quickly as possible to everyone on Earth."Read More...
E-mail from Ronald Pearson to Rory MacDonald (May 8, 2003): Answer to Critique
2003-May-08 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson responds to criticism of his theories:
"I think the problem is that theorists are still considering sub-atomic particles as real when wave-particle duality indicates that they are simply abstract constructs of the background mind."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to John Samson (September 16, 2002): Society for Psychical Research
2002-September-16 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This crushing proof of survival after death was not only censored by those who control what sees the light of day within the one-god religion of Spiritualism. It has also been censored by the thought police who have infiltrated the Society for Psychical Research ever since I first submitted these reports in 1983."Read More...
An Open Letter to the Bath-based Scientist Ronald Pearson (June 27, 2002): Professor David Fontana
2002-June-27 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"(...) the former President of the Society for Psychical Research, the psychologist Prof. David Fontana, is lecturing to students linking life after death with subatomic physics (...)"Read More...
E-mail from Jeff Rense, to Michael Roll and Ron Pearson (April 4, 2002): Presenting the Secular Scientific Case for Survival
In his e-mail, Jeff Rense writes:
"There was without question, an instinctive recognition by millions of listeners that your and Ron's work is LOGICAL, SENSIBLE, and PRAGMATICALLY brilliant."Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to The Royal Society (April 26, 2002): Philosophical Balance
2002-April-26 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"I see that Professor Bernard Carr, the President of the SPR, has been booked to speak at The Royal Society on 9th May. May those of us who have started from the base that Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge were correct in their conclusions be permitted to balance the thoughts of Prof. Carr and the hierarchy of the SPR?"Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Lord May (November 16, 2005): Subatomic Physics: The Study of the Invisible Part of the Universe
2005-November-16 Filed in: Science
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Surely Ronald Pearson must now be in line for the Nobel Prize for Physics that should have been given to the pioneers of subatomic physics, Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge? I can't think of anything more important than the scientific discovery of the so-called next world because it affects every person on Earth. "Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Ian Hislop (November 20, 2001): Excommunication from Islam - Tony Blair's Admiration for Islam
2001-November-20 Filed in: Religion
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Mohammed had exactly the same experience as I did during a scientific experiment. A person from the etheric (spirit) world materialised and hugged him. We can now understand why our ancestors thought something supernatural had happened."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (July 2, 2001): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death
2001-July-02 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Uncomfortable discoveries in physics that prove we all survive the death of our physical bodies are being deliberately blocked from even coming to the attention of people in Great Britain for them to accept or reject as the case may be. This is solely to keep the old-boy network ticking over nicely."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Gary Schwartz (May 1, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth
2003-May-01 Filed in: Mediums
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This begs the question, why has Prof. Archie Roy kept quiet about the revolutionary mediumship of Rita Goold that he witnessed in 1983?"Read More...
Open Letter from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (November 28, 2005): A Fair Balance in SPR Publications
2005-November-28 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Surely in a situation as divided as this, rules should be made that all editors must be duty bound to always balance these two conflicting opinions, especially as I have proved to you that scientists within The Royal Society are relying on their colleagues within the SPR to keep a sharp look out for any important discoveries in what Sir Oliver Lodge called "Psychic Science"?"Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Chris Robinson (August 16, 2002): Einstein has got it Wrong!
2002-August-16 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Ronald Pearson's mathematics matches the experiments proving survival after death. Einstein's Theory of Relativity did away with the ether (the "spirit" world) in 1905. A scientific disaster."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Dene Jones (August 13, 2002): No Priest Believes in What They are Selling!
2002-August-13 Filed in: Religion
This e-mail was also sent to talksport.co.uk, bbc.co.uk, observer.co.uk, channel5.co.uk, guardian.co.uk, channel4.com, itv.co.uk, telegraph.co.uk.
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Every priest knows that no book has divine authority. They are all acting out an outrageous charade and getting paid for it."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 21, 2003): Scientific Proof of Survival
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In all my writings, broadcasts and lectures I say the religionists are basically correct, we do indeed possess a soul and survive the death of our physical body. The priests and the believers in priestcraft flatly refuse to grab this lifeline."Read More...
E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (May 17, 2004): A Holistic Solution is Available
2004-May-17 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"Readers need to know that a little read theory has been available in a scientific journal since 1997 that shows all these problems can be resolved simultaneously. Added credibility is provided from the way a solution to the vexed question of the "cosmological constant" is provided - and no other solution has yet appeared!"Read More...
Ronald Pearson's Response to Bernard Carr's Letter of March 17, 2001 (March 31, 2001): Is The SPR Serious About Being Even Handed?
This letter was published in Psychic News, March 31, 2001
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"Theorists are searching for a 'Theory of Everything' and yet deliberately ignore the major factor: that psi phenomena suggest that something else must exist behind the universe of matter."Read More...
"The SPR refused my paper on grounds that it needed to first appear in a scientific journal because the expertise needed for its assessment did not exist within the SPR. This condition is now satisfied (...). Is the SPR now prepared to prove its claim of having no corporate policy by publication of this approach?"
E-mail from Ron Pearson to New Scientist (July 4, 2003): Flaws in Physics - WHY PHYSICISTS SHOULD LISTEN TO ENGINEERS
2003-July-04 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"The mathematical expertise of the physicist is admired and not denied but the engineer can help with the simple things and so could have a useful part to play. This flaw would be immediately obvious to any mechanical engineer, especially one with experience of turbine design, since the effect is analogous to that used to extract energy from a fluid by a moving rotor."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Melody Mehta (January 9, 2002): Church and State
2002-January-09 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Immediately people find out that it's a scientific fact that we all survive death then nobody will ever grovel before a priest again."Read More...
E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (May 1, 2002): The Vatican Takes Its Own Scientific Path
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"They date everything from 1543, Copernicus, the Roman Catholic priest who said the Earth goes round the Sun. They are of course very careful not to let the public know that Copernicus came across the work of the great Greek scientist Aristarchus 280 BC! The Vatican has now embraced Darwin hook, line and sinker. However, again they are very careful not to mention Alfred Russel Wallace who was the co-author of the Theory of Evolution. He has been written out of our Christian history books because he put forward the secular case for survival after death as a branch of physics - that we are dealing with natural forces in the universe.Read More...
All the time orthodox scientists have gone down the wrong path - the Big Bang and Einstein's Theory of Relativity they are no danger whatsoever to the power of the priests. It makes the priests the only alternative, they keep the mystery going and their lucrative monopoly on the vast life after death industry."
E-mail from Michael Roll to Melody Mehta (May 19, 2002): Ronald Pearson
2002-May-19 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"As you know Pearson's papers have been censored by every organisation that is pretending to be looking into life after death and related subjects, especially The Society for Psychical Research!"Read More...
Letter from Montague Keen to Psychic News (March 10, 2001): Scole: No Evidence of Fraud
2001-March-10 Filed in: Mediums
In his letter, Montague Keen writes:
"What is depressing about the critics is their willingness to construct an upturned pyramid of hypotheses and speculations, all balanced on one improbable assumption after another. What is so remarkable is their unwillingness to accept the oft repeated challenge to take the scientifically warranted course of viewing all the evidence together, rather than attempting to pick theoretical holes in every individual item."
It is notable that this letter was published in Psychic News and not in New Scientist, where it would have provided a balance to the outburst from Dr. Susan Blackmore published there on November 4, 2000. Dr Blackmore referred to the Scole Report as "infamous".
It is also notable that experiments carried out by Professor Gary Schwartz are never censored because he has not linked the subject of survival after death with natural forces in the universe, and with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics that looks at the invisible part of the universe.
E-mail from Ronald Pearson to Keith Hudson (August 28, 2003): Origin and Destiny of Religion
2003-August-28 Filed in: Religion
In his e-mail, Ronald Pearson writes:
"The conflict between science and religion is only a deliberate surface projection.Read More...
(...)
This artificial division is blocking the progress of both disciplines since there can be only one truth."
E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 10, 2003): Scientific Proof
2003-January-10 Filed in: Campaign
In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"this memo to William Woollard could explain why Dr. John Beloff and Professor Archie Roy worked together to make sure your scientific paper did not come to the attention of members of the Society for Psychical Research via their journal."Read More...
Letter from Michael Roll to Ian Hislop (December 16, 2001): Corruption in the Scientific Community
2001-December-16 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Almost single-handedly this "expert" is holding up the pillar of orthodox scientific teaching throughout the world - that the mind and brain are the same and that death is the end of everything."Read More...
Open Letter to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales (June 30, 2002): Ronald Pearson
2002-June-30 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"[Sir William Crookes] was quite rightly made President of The Royal Society, knighted and awarded the highest decoration in the land - The Order of Merit.Read More...
Surely the same honour should be bestowed on the Derbyshire scientist Ronald D. Pearson who has provided the missing mathematics to back up the experiments that were carried out by Sir William Crookes whose paper was published in 1874 in The Quarterly Journal of Science?"
Letter from Ronald Pearson to Michael Roll (January 2001): Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation
2001-January-29 Filed in: Censorship
This letter comments on the letter from January, 1996 rejecting Pearson's paper Key to Consciousness: Quantum gravitation from publication in the Journal of Consciousness Studies.
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"As it stands the rejection looks reasonable because it implies it was assessed "fairly and openly". The truth is very different. Both rejection letters made absolutely no reference to anything in the paper. Both simply extolled the perfection of general relativity as the best possible theory of gravity which could ever be devised and that was it!"Read More...
Letter from Ronald Pearson to Psychic News (January 24, 2001): Peer Refereeing
2001-January-24 Filed in: Censorship
In his letter, Ronald Pearson writes:
"It has become very clear that physicists have been secretly operating a 'closed shop' for many years and this is still stifling much needed progress."Read More...
Open Letter from John Samson (January 9, 2001): Survivalists in the SPR
2001-January-09 Filed in: Campaign
This letter was written after Professor Bernard Carr was made President of the SPR.
Professor Bernard Carr and his committee rejected Ronald Pearson's paper that he had prepared for the 23rd International Conference of the SPR held at the University of Durham in September 1999. He also censored Michael Roll's paper that told the story of how mothers had been physically reunited with their "dead" children over and over again.
Professor Carr justified this decision with the following words:
In his letter, John Samson writes:
Professor Bernard Carr and his committee rejected Ronald Pearson's paper that he had prepared for the 23rd International Conference of the SPR held at the University of Durham in September 1999. He also censored Michael Roll's paper that told the story of how mothers had been physically reunited with their "dead" children over and over again.
Professor Carr justified this decision with the following words:
"Your topic is not really appropriate for the conference audience.”
In his letter, John Samson writes:
"when one links this statement with the vociferous attempts by those at the heart of the SPR who wished to suppress the Scole Report and regarded it as 'an embarrassment to the Society', then we are confronted by a most regrettable situation indeed.”Read More...
Letter from Graham Butler to Lyn G. de Swarte (April 11, 2000): Michael Roll
2000-April-11 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter, Graham Butler writes:
"I would like to endorse, through your columns, the scientific approach to Spiritualism and survival as advocated by Michael Roll. His indefatigable energy in promoting the best evidence available is, like your own, wholly admirable.”Read More...
Letter from Ian Robson to New Scientist (December 6, 1999): Counter-Arguments to Einstein's Theories
1999-December-06 Filed in: Science
In his letter, Ian Robson writes:
”It should be pointed out that since Einstein published his theories, more than a few eminent researchers have produced counter-arguments to them.”Read More...
(…)
””Since quantum mechanics came into being, the famous scientist Stephen Hawkingadmitted that this branch of physics is incompatible with relativity and that one or the other must be wrong.”
(…)
”Will your magazine tell the truth to the British people?”
E-mail from Ron Pearson to Vlatco Vedral (April 21, 2013): Matter is Made from Information - not Energy
2013-April-21 Filed in: Science
In his e-mail, Ron Pearson writes:
"I was intrigued to see that quantum physicists are now saying that our world is constructed entirely of information and not energy. But do they have any idea of the source of that information?”Read More...
Open Letter from Ron Pearson to John Samson (August 13, 1999): Does the Society for Psychical Research Have a "Corporate Policy"?
In his letter, Ron Pearson writes:
"The corporate policy of the SPR is to support a paradigm of established physics: that mind is mere brain function.Read More...
(…)
This is in direct conflict with an overwhelming bulk of evidence, which shows that our immortal minds transfer to another system of matter invisible and untouchable to us (since it operates on a different quantum wavelength). I think this is the main reason the Church has tried to suppress the truth about the real nature of spirituality for so many centuries."
Letter from Nancy Kolenda to Ron Pearson (August 8, 1997): Publication of Consciousness as a Sub-quantum Phenomenon
1997-August-08 Filed in: Science
At the time of writing, Nancy Kolenda was Director of The Center for Frontier Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
In her letter, Nancy Kolenda writes:
In her letter, Nancy Kolenda writes:
"I am most grateful to you for submitting such as fine paper and admire your editing cooperation. May we be honored to have you submit future papers in Frontier Perspectives."Read More...
Letter from Rev. Anthony Freeman to Ronald Pearson (January 21, 1996): Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation
1996-January-21 Filed in: Science
At the time of writing, Rev. Anthony Freeman was Managing Editor of The Journal of Consciousness Studies
Rev. Freeman wrote to Ronald Pearson, rejecting his paper "Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation”.
In his letter, Rev. Freeman writes of the assessment of Ronald Pearson's paper:
Rev. Freeman wrote to Ronald Pearson, rejecting his paper "Key to Consciousness: Quantum Gravitation”.
In his letter, Rev. Freeman writes of the assessment of Ronald Pearson's paper:
"You will disagree with its conclusion, but I am sure you will recognise a fair and considered assessment of the situation in which we find ourselves.”Read More...
Letter from Rev. Dr. John Polkinghorne to Ronald Pearson (October 15, 1993)
1993-October-15 Filed in: Science
In his letter, John Polkinghorne writes:
"I have to say that the quantum theory of gravity is exceptionally difficult and I am very doubtful that it is possible for amateurs, however gifted and interested, to make contributions to it.”Read More...
Letter from Buckingham Palace to Michael Roll (April 28, 1993)
1993-April-28 Filed in: Campaign
In his letter to Michael Roll, Kenneth Scott writes:
"The Queen has taken note of your suggestion that Mr. Ronald Pearson should be awarded the Order of Merit."Read More...